Panaman's Blog RSS

Some thoughts on current affairs in commodity markets and politics.

Archive

Dec
31st
Fri
permalink

2011 World Energy and Economic Outlook – Muddled Futurology

As the year ends on a high note for equities and energy commodities (US indices rose roughly 10% on the year, EU indices up 9%, crude and Brent up $10 year, RBOB Gasoline up $0.50…), energy authorities (EIA, IEA and OPEC) and market analysts are having a go at the outlook for energy prices, supply and demand for 2011.

The price and demand of energy will largely be determined by the state of the global economic recovery, and in particular, the propensity of the Eurozone to simply survive an attack on the legitimacy of a monetary union sans political (fiscal) integration.

There are arguments on the bearish and bullish side of the fence that shed light on where we could be a year from now. Ultimately however, there are a few “Black Swans” such as the collapse of the Eurozone, a war with Iran, or a total meltdown in high frequency trading platforms, that could collapse or spike energy price.

Crude will go to 100 bucks a pop – here’s why

Analysts at JP Morgan and BOA have bullish outlooks for 2011, based namely on a sustained recovery and a weakening US Dollar following The Fed’s announced fiscal incontinence through the coming quarters (QE2, QE3…). Stockpiles in crude oil are further expected to drop further through 2011 thanks in part to the underlying rising demand from emerging economies. Geopolitical tensions in Iran and North Korea along with financial speculation add further clout to a bullish however volatile upcoming year. Top that off with OPEC’s clear intentions to have a “fair” price in the $90 range (Saudi oil minister Ali Al-Naimi famously let that one slip in early December) and you have some solid arguments for a bullish year in crude oil. Safe to say OPEC would like crude in the $90 range and will use its power to shut off supply valves as best as it can. One should remember however that non-OPEC countries produce more oil daily than OPEC.

Naturally, creeping rising oil prices will ultimately have effects on consumers at the pump (money given to Chevron is money taken away from tangible consumption…) and possibly create a feedback loop of price resistances around a sustained $100/barrel price if energy prices start to pull back on an economic recovery.  

Crude is overbought, 75 bucks a barrel is a price based on fundamental indicators

One of the driving factors for a bullish end to the year in crude has been the perception that a) The Fed’s $600 bn purchase of Treasury securities will inevitably debase the dollar and thus drive up crude prices, and that b) Economic indicators in the US (job claims, construction, Purchasing Managers’ Indexes) are putting the US on the road to recovery.

As concerns the dollar, it has performed well in the forex market since QE2 was announced, and has constituted the lesser evil of currencies in light of the Euro’s debt debacle (gold, a fiat currency just not in reach of policymakers, is the true hedge from the forex market). Furthermore and perhaps more importantly, despite the injection of over half a trillion dollars into the US banking system and a substantial rise in monetary growth, the adjusted monetary base in the US has in fact not budged, meaning that fresh cash in the US banking system is not making it out of vaults and reserve account and thus not into the broader economy. As such, an stable US dollar on the forex market is conceivable resulting in crude prices dampened by deflationary trends.  

With regards to the recovery in the US, a reversal hinges on several possible events, namely an attack on the Eurozone, which if it breaks up, could cause a loss of up to 10% of GDP in the EU. The EU’s very real, and very serious sovereign debt default risks worsened by the marauding bond market could see the 2011 road to recovery take a long detour through the “Euro collapse” scenic route. On this point, even the haphazardly created European Financial Stability Facility (a half baked attempt to have Germany, France and the US via IMF guarantee Eurodebt) will not stop a serious attack on Spanish debt levels, not to mention Italian or Belgian ones – countries whose debt/GDP ratio are either at 100% or approaching…

“Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future” 


It is hard to foresee how the Fed’s intervention in the economy will unravel. Harder yet will be the Eurozone’s stress test in 2011, which will inevitably see bond markets test the debt levels of countries belonging to an integrated currency area, yet lacking the fiscal redistribution capacity to address debt, deficit and growth imbalances across the area (more on this, read Krugman’s Lessons from Massachusetts). All bets are on for 2011, we could see equity prices go through the roof at the risk of creating an asset bubble, gold hit $2,000/oz, and crude hit a plateau of $100. The arguments are certainly there to support that scenario. Yet also likely, is a sharp reversal in energy prices based on stronger dollar prices, low demand across the OECD, and catastrophic debt defaults in Europe. 

Oct
1st
Wed
permalink

Maverecon’s FT blog entry on Fortis

Maverecon’s  (Willem Buiter - my former professor at the LSE and former central banker) entry on the ft blog website… Interesting take on Fortis’ nationalization, although it has never been a secret that the EU is an economically integrated entity, so appropriately, a supranational response to a cross national banking problem is warranted. Wasn’t it just in the summer of ‘07 that the ECB injected several billions into the EU markets?  Notice that the cooperation of the actors in this case are all economic agents from various levels of governance. I’m still waiting for political integration in the EU…

“A bad day for Benelux banking - a great day for Europe

The most important financial crisis-related news this morning is not the tentative agreement on TARP-lite reached over the weekend in the USA.  At best this is a holding operation that buys (a little) time for the US banking system while the industry and the authorities figure out how to recapitalise the banking sector.  It is also not the nationalisation of Bradford and Bingley, a systemically unimportant UK bank specialising in residential and buy-to-let mortgages.  B&B is less than half the size of Northern Rock (at its peak). The nationalisation demonstrates that the UK government will not let even the smallest remaining deposit-taking bank go under.  By the British tax payer effectively underwriting the entire UK banking system, the authorities now may have a short window of relative calm to decide on the further consolidation and recapitalisation of the UK banking sector.

The most important development was, however, the rescue of Fortis through the Belgian, Dutch and Luxembourg governments taking 49% equity stakes in Fortis’s banking operations in each of these three countries.  The ability of the euro area fiscal authorities to co-ordinate on a bail-out for a bank with not-only strong cross-boundary operations, but indeed with a strong multi-national (almost supranational) identity was untested until today.  They passed the test.  Everyone who mattered, the national monetary authorities, the President of the ECB, the national regulatory authorities, the three national ministers of finance and the President of the Eurogroup chipped in and played their part.

Especially remarkable is the fact that it took much less time and effort to put together the multi-country fiscal rescue effort of the three EU member states than it took to cobble together the son-of-TARP in the US.  Incipient federalism triumphs over disfunctional established federalism.

A bad day for Benelux banking.  A great day for European cooperation and unity.”

Willem Buiter’s blog:
http://blogs.ft.com/maverecon/